| Title |
Technological advances in maize breeding: past, present and future
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00122-019-03306-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carson Andorf, William D. Beavis, Matthew Hufford, Stephen Smith, Walter P. Suza, Kan Wang, Margaret Woodhouse, Jianming Yu, Thomas Lübberstedt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 240 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 15% |
| Researcher | 29 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 10% |
| Unknown | 78 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 112 | 47% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Unknown | 87 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2019.
All research outputs
#18,530,416
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#3,046
of 3,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,642
of 354,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#44
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,565 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.