↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence, Severity, and Correlates of Problematic Sexual Internet Use in Swedish Men and Women

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
154 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
Title
Prevalence, Severity, and Correlates of Problematic Sexual Internet Use in Swedish Men and Women
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, May 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10508-011-9762-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael W. Ross, Sven-Axel Månsson, Kristian Daneback

Abstract

The content and prevalence of problematic Internet sexual use was investigated in a sample of 1,913 Internet-recruited younger Swedish men and women. Five items as part of a larger Internet sexual use study addressed problems associated with it, control, dysphoria, feeling "addicted," and feeling the need for treatment. The resulting scale of Internet sexual problems indicated that 5% of women and 13% of men reported some problems, with 2% of women and 5% of men indicating serious problems across the five items. Of five predictors of problematic use, three were significant: religiosity, having negative experiences with Internet sexual use, and frequency of pornography viewing. The viewing and sharing of pornography was most closely associated with reported problems. Data also suggested that having some very specific pornographic content interests were associated with an increase in reported problems. While these data were limited by the non-random nature of the sample, they suggest that Internet sexual problems are measurable, are a subset of Internet addiction with sexual content, and affect a small but significant proportion of the Internet-using population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 130 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 17%
Student > Master 20 15%
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Researcher 17 13%
Other 8 6%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 32 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 50 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 11%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 38 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2020.
All research outputs
#14,024,569
of 23,750,517 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#2,679
of 3,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,451
of 111,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#23
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,750,517 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.