| Title |
Redefining the Cerrado–Amazonia transition: implications for conservation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-019-01720-z |
| Authors |
Eduardo Q. Marques, Ben Hur Marimon-Junior, Beatriz S. Marimon, Eraldo A. T. Matricardi, Henrique A. Mews, Guarino R. Colli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 16% |
| Brazil | 4 | 13% |
| France | 3 | 10% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Peru | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 52% |
| Scientists | 13 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 236 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 30 | 13% |
| Researcher | 29 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 37 | 16% |
| Unknown | 60 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 84 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 39 | 17% |
| Engineering | 9 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Unknown | 77 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,387,487
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#177
of 2,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,078
of 370,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#5
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,548 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.