You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation frameworks in health services: An integrative review of use, attributes and elements
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Nursing, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1111/jocn.14842 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Natalie Bradford, Shirley Chambers, Adrienne Hudson, Jacqui Jauncey‐Cooke, Robyn Penny, Carol Windsor, Patsy Yates |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Australia | 1 | 17% |
| Timor-Leste | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Researcher | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 22% |
| Unknown | 22 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 14 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 17% |
| Unknown | 24 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2019.
All research outputs
#7,805,468
of 23,842,189 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#2,309
of 5,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,742
of 353,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#42
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,842,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,430 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.