↓ Skip to main content

Acaricidal Activity of Eugenol Based Compounds against Scabies Mites

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acaricidal Activity of Eugenol Based Compounds against Scabies Mites
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0012079
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cielo Pasay, Kate Mounsey, Graeme Stevenson, Rohan Davis, Larry Arlian, Marjorie Morgan, DiAnn Vyszenski-Moher, Kathy Andrews, James McCarthy

Abstract

Human scabies is a debilitating skin disease caused by the "itch mite" Sarcoptes scabiei. Ordinary scabies is commonly treated with topical creams such as permethrin, while crusted scabies is treated with topical creams in combination with oral ivermectin. Recent reports of acaricide tolerance in scabies endemic communities in Northern Australia have prompted efforts to better understand resistance mechanisms and to identify potential new acaricides. In this study, we screened three essential oils and four pure compounds based on eugenol for acaricidal properties.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 129 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 15%
Student > Master 18 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 11 8%
Other 29 22%
Unknown 27 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 8%
Chemistry 8 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 32 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,151,320
of 25,351,219 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#14,731
of 219,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,340
of 101,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#54
of 796 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,351,219 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 219,969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 796 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.