↓ Skip to main content

Serial MRI of limbic encephalitis

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroradiology, April 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
158 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
Title
Serial MRI of limbic encephalitis
Published in
Neuroradiology, April 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00234-006-0069-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Horst Urbach, Bettina M. Soeder, Monika Jeub, Thomas Klockgether, Bernhard Meyer, Christian G. Bien

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Italy 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 88 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 19%
Other 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Other 23 24%
Unknown 16 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 47%
Neuroscience 14 15%
Psychology 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 22 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2017.
All research outputs
#7,473,822
of 22,849,304 outputs
Outputs from Neuroradiology
#306
of 1,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,319
of 66,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroradiology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,849,304 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,394 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them