↓ Skip to main content

甲状腺乳頭癌のリンパ節転移

Overview of attention for article published in JOURNAL OF JAPAN SOCIETY FOR HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, January 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
甲状腺乳頭癌のリンパ節転移
Published in
JOURNAL OF JAPAN SOCIETY FOR HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, January 1992
DOI 10.5106/jjshns.2.49
Authors

高橋 久昭, 河西 信勝, 鎌田 信悦

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2016.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL OF JAPAN SOCIETY FOR HEAD AND NECK SURGERY
#8
of 18 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,304
of 61,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL OF JAPAN SOCIETY FOR HEAD AND NECK SURGERY
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one scored the same or higher as 10 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them