You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A multi‐centre retrospective study of rituximab use in the treatment of relapsed or resistant warm autoimmune haemolytic anaemia
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal of Haematology, August 2013
|
DOI | 10.1111/bjh.12486 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Su W. Maung, Maeve Leahy, Hilary M. O'Leary, Irfan Khan, Mary R. Cahill, Oonagh Gilligan, Philip Murphy, Suzanne McPherson, Fred Jackson, Mary Ryan, Brian Hennessy, Johnny McHugh, Matthew Goodyer, Larry Bacon, Peter O'Gorman, Aisling Nee, Michael O'Dwyer, Helen Enright, Jean Saunders, Denis O'Keeffe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ireland | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 18% |
Other | 6 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 10% |
Researcher | 4 | 10% |
Other | 6 | 15% |
Unknown | 7 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 74% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 8 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2016.
All research outputs
#7,061,179
of 24,558,777 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Haematology
#2,587
of 7,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,040
of 203,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Haematology
#13
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,558,777 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,910 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.