↓ Skip to main content

Perceptions of urban climate hazards and their effects on adaptation agendas

Overview of attention for article published in Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Perceptions of urban climate hazards and their effects on adaptation agendas
Published in
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11027-015-9697-1
Authors

Taedong Lee, Sara Hughes

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 26 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 17 22%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Engineering 4 5%
Unspecified 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 16 21%
Unknown 28 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2016.
All research outputs
#6,272,753
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
#422
of 688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,020
of 407,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.