You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Signal Integration by Shadow Enhancers and Enhancer Duplications Varies across the Drosophila Embryo
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell Reports, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.01.115 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Clarissa Scholes, Kelly M. Biette, Timothy T. Harden, Angela H. DePace |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 21 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 16% |
| France | 5 | 8% |
| Germany | 4 | 6% |
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 11 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 42 | 66% |
| Members of the public | 18 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 39% |
| Researcher | 14 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 17 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 38 | 49% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 23% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 1% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 16 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,208,880
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Cell Reports
#2,788
of 12,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,786
of 447,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Reports
#74
of 321 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,965 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 321 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.