↓ Skip to main content

Neurofibromatosis type 2

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
506 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
389 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neurofibromatosis type 2
Published in
The Lancet, May 2009
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60259-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ashok R Asthagiri, Dilys M Parry, John A Butman, H Jeffrey Kim, Ekaterini T Tsilou, Zhengping Zhuang, Russell R Lonser

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 389 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 374 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 51 13%
Student > Master 39 10%
Researcher 38 10%
Other 34 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 33 8%
Other 102 26%
Unknown 92 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 164 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 8%
Neuroscience 21 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 2%
Other 30 8%
Unknown 99 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#25,991
of 42,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,788
of 106,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#105
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,671 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.