↓ Skip to main content

A randomized controlled trial of web‐based training to increase activity in children with cerebral palsy

Overview of attention for article published in Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A randomized controlled trial of web‐based training to increase activity in children with cerebral palsy
Published in
Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, February 2016
DOI 10.1111/dmcn.13065
Pubmed ID
Authors

Louise E Mitchell, Jenny Ziviani, Roslyn N Boyd

Abstract

To determine the efficacy of web-based training on activity capacity and performance in children with unilateral cerebral palsy (CP). In a matched-pairs randomized waitlist controlled trial, independently ambulant children and adolescents with unilateral CP were allocated to receive 30 minutes of training (intervention) 6 days per week, or usual care (waitlist control) for 20 weeks. Activity capacity was assessed using maximal repetitions of functional strength tasks and 6-minute walk test (6MWT); performance using 4-day ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometer records at baseline and 20 weeks. Data were analysed by intention to treat comparing between groups using hierarchical linear modelling. Participants were n=101, 52 males, mean age 11 years 3 months (SD 2y 4mo). Intervention participants completed a mean 32.4 hours (SD 17.2) of training, associated with significant improvements in functional strength (mean difference 19.3 repetitions; 95% confidence interval [CI] 10.8-27.7; p<0.001) and 6MWT distance (mean difference 38.9m; 95% CI 12.3-51.9; p<0.001) compared with the control group at 20 weeks, although not activity performance (p>0.05). Training was effective at increasing functional strength and walking endurance in independently ambulant children with unilateral CP. This did not translate into improvements in activity performance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 207 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 14%
Student > Master 25 12%
Researcher 23 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 10%
Student > Postgraduate 14 7%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 71 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 41 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 14%
Sports and Recreations 19 9%
Psychology 10 5%
Neuroscience 9 4%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 80 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2016.
All research outputs
#15,436,358
of 24,471,305 outputs
Outputs from Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
#2,868
of 4,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,423
of 412,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
#28
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,471,305 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 412,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.