↓ Skip to main content

Muscle quality as a complementary prognostic tool in conjunction with sarcopenia assessment in younger and older individuals

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
Title
Muscle quality as a complementary prognostic tool in conjunction with sarcopenia assessment in younger and older individuals
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, February 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00421-019-04107-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew J. Lees, Oliver J. Wilson, Karen Hind, Theocharis Ispoglou

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 119 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 18%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Master 10 8%
Professor 7 6%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 37 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 23 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 7%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 45 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2022.
All research outputs
#5,312,720
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#1,449
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,041
of 367,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#24
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.