↓ Skip to main content

A comparison of surgeons' posture during laparoscopic and open surgical procedures

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, February 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
250 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
A comparison of surgeons' posture during laparoscopic and open surgical procedures
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, February 1997
DOI 10.1007/s004649900316
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. Berguer, G. T. Rab, H. Abu-Ghaida, A. Alarcon, J. Chung

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 99 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Other 7 7%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 25 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 33%
Engineering 20 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 31 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2011.
All research outputs
#12,945,022
of 22,849,304 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#2,609
of 6,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,394
of 91,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,849,304 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,040 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.