Title |
Michael Faraday's recognition of ruby gold: the birth of modern nanotechnology
|
---|---|
Published in |
Gold Bulletin, December 2007
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf03215598 |
Authors |
David Thompson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 200 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 23% |
Student > Master | 34 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 31 | 15% |
Researcher | 13 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
Other | 24 | 12% |
Unknown | 44 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 59 | 29% |
Materials Science | 17 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 7% |
Engineering | 13 | 6% |
Physics and Astronomy | 11 | 5% |
Other | 35 | 17% |
Unknown | 54 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,759,871
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Gold Bulletin
#13
of 198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,050
of 166,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gold Bulletin
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.