↓ Skip to main content

Dustborne fungi in large office buildings

Overview of attention for article published in Mycopathologia, September 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 1,167)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Dustborne fungi in large office buildings
Published in
Mycopathologia, September 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1015592224368
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hsing Jasmine Chao, Donald K. Milton, Joel Schwartz, Harriet A. Burge

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 47 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Professor 4 8%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 12 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 9 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 13%
Engineering 5 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 15 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2016.
All research outputs
#1,449,548
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Mycopathologia
#16
of 1,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,284
of 48,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mycopathologia
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,167 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them