↓ Skip to main content

Conditionals in Theories of Truth

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Philosophical Logic, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Conditionals in Theories of Truth
Published in
Journal of Philosophical Logic, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10992-015-9393-3
Authors

Anil Gupta, Shawn Standefer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Lecturer 1 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 3 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2016.
All research outputs
#18,441,836
of 22,849,304 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Philosophical Logic
#271
of 349 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#287,657
of 397,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Philosophical Logic
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,849,304 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 349 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.