↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy on Specificity of Life Goals

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Therapy and Research, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
Title
Effects of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy on Specificity of Life Goals
Published in
Cognitive Therapy and Research, January 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10608-010-9349-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine Crane, Rosie Winder, Emily Hargus, Myanthi Amarasinghe, Thorsten Barnhofer

Abstract

This study explored the immediate effects of a course of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) for chronically depressed participants with a history of suicidality on the specificity of important goals for the future. Participants were randomly allocated to immediate treatment with MBCT or to a waitlist condition and life goals were assessed both before and after the treatment or waiting period. Results showed that participants receiving MBCT reported significantly more specific goals post-treatment whereas those allocated to the waitlist condition showed no significant change. Similarly, participants allocated to MBCT regarded themselves as significantly more likely to achieve their important goals post-treatment, whilst again there was no significant change in the waitlist group. Increases in goal specificity were associated with parallel increases in autobiographical memory specificity whereas increases in goal likelihood were associated with reductions in depressed mood. These results suggest that MBCT may enable participants to clarify their important goals and in doing so increase their confidence in their capacity to move in valued life directions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Unknown 199 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 14%
Researcher 26 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Other 44 21%
Unknown 30 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 115 56%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 8%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Neuroscience 6 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 1%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 42 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2016.
All research outputs
#6,042,074
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Therapy and Research
#301
of 953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,907
of 187,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Therapy and Research
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.