| Title |
Rib Fracture Repair: Indications, Technical Issues, and Future Directions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Surgery, October 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00268-008-9770-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Raminder Nirula, Jose J. Diaz, Donald D. Trunkey, John C. Mayberry |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 150 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 13% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Researcher | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 10% |
| Other | 32 | 21% |
| Unknown | 32 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 89 | 58% |
| Engineering | 7 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 36 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2021.
All research outputs
#3,633,703
of 22,849,304 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#547
of 4,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,635
of 91,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,849,304 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,336 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.