↓ Skip to main content

Virtual reality for assembly methods prototyping: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Virtual Reality, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
281 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
364 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Virtual reality for assembly methods prototyping: a review
Published in
Virtual Reality, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10055-009-0153-y
Authors

Abhishek Seth, Judy M. Vance, James H. Oliver

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 364 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 350 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 82 23%
Student > Master 59 16%
Student > Bachelor 45 12%
Researcher 32 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 6%
Other 45 12%
Unknown 78 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 102 28%
Computer Science 80 22%
Design 20 5%
Psychology 18 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 13 4%
Other 38 10%
Unknown 93 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,585,435
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from Virtual Reality
#126
of 358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,094
of 165,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virtual Reality
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 358 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.