| Title |
More grist for the mill? Species delimitation in the genomic era and its implications for conservation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-019-01149-5 |
| Authors |
David W. G. Stanton, Peter Frandsen, Ryan K. Waples, Rasmus Heller, Isa-Rita M. Russo, Pablo A. Orozco-terWengel, Casper-Emil Tingskov Pedersen, Hans R. Siegismund, Michael W. Bruford |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 26% |
| Sweden | 2 | 7% |
| Portugal | 2 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Norway | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 15 | 56% |
| Members of the public | 11 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 202 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 15% |
| Researcher | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 16% |
| Unknown | 42 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 95 | 47% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 35 | 17% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 6% |
| Engineering | 3 | 1% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 1% |
| Unknown | 53 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,118,606
of 23,294,050 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#113
of 1,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,410
of 354,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#8
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,294,050 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.