You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Soil-transmitted helminth reinfection four and six months after mass drug administration: results from the delta region of Myanmar
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006591 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julia C. Dunn, Alison A. Bettis, Nay Yee Wyine, Aye Moe Moe Lwin, Aung Tun, Nay Soe Maung, Roy M. Anderson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 3 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 20% |
| United States | 3 | 20% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Sweden | 1 | 7% |
| Ireland | 1 | 7% |
| Lao People's Democratic Republic | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 60% |
| Scientists | 6 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 22% |
| Researcher | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 41 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 44 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,314,083
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#2,278
of 9,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,540
of 474,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#48
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.