| Title |
Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada disease: inquiry into the genesis of a disease name in the historical context of Switzerland and Japan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Ophthalmology, April 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10792-007-9083-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carl P. Herbort, Manabu Mochizuki |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 25% |
| Researcher | 6 | 15% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 10 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 55% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2019.
All research outputs
#7,473,822
of 22,849,304 outputs
Outputs from International Ophthalmology
#123
of 1,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,373
of 72,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Ophthalmology
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,849,304 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,032 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.