↓ Skip to main content

Case series: gaming vs. eating—comorbidity of ARFID and IGD

Overview of attention for article published in Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Case series: gaming vs. eating—comorbidity of ARFID and IGD
Published in
Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity, February 2019
DOI 10.1007/s40519-019-00639-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ashley N. Hadwiger, Amy B. Middleman, Paulette D. Pitt

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 13 17%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Researcher 7 9%
Other 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 28 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 13 17%
Psychology 12 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 33 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2019.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity
#939
of 1,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#321,194
of 366,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity
#22
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,126 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.