↓ Skip to main content

TGF-β – an excellent servant but a bad master

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
397 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
833 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
TGF-β – an excellent servant but a bad master
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1479-5876-10-183
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lenka Kubiczkova, Lenka Sedlarikova, Roman Hajek, Sabina Sevcikova

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 833 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Gambia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 814 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 149 18%
Student > Master 111 13%
Student > Bachelor 110 13%
Researcher 95 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 4%
Other 90 11%
Unknown 242 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 173 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 154 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 96 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 46 6%
Engineering 19 2%
Other 85 10%
Unknown 260 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,393,575
of 25,483,400 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#260
of 4,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,310
of 187,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#3
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,483,400 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,658 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.