↓ Skip to main content

Using Monte Carlo simulation to assess variability and uncertainty of tobacco consumption in a city by sewage epidemiology

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using Monte Carlo simulation to assess variability and uncertainty of tobacco consumption in a city by sewage epidemiology
Published in
BMJ Open, February 2016
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010583
Pubmed ID
Authors

De-Gao Wang, Qian-Qian Dong, Juan Du, Shuo Yang, Yun-Jie Zhang, Guang-Shui Na, Stuart G Ferguson, Zhuang Wang, Tong Zheng

Abstract

To use Monte Carlo simulation to assess the uncertainty and variability of tobacco consumption through wastewater analysis in a city. A total of 11 wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) (serving 2.2 million people; approximately 83% of urban population in Dalian) were selected and sampled. By detection and quantification of principal metabolites of nicotine, cotinine (COT) and trans-3'-hydroxycotinine (OH-COT), in raw wastewater, back calculation of tobacco use in the population of WWTPs can be realised. COT and OH-COT were detected in the entire set of samples with an average concentration of 2.33±0.30 and 2.76±0.91 µg/L, respectively. The mass load of absorbed NIC during the sampling period ranged from 0.25 to 4.22 mg/day/capita with an average of 1.92 mg/day/capita. Using these data, we estimated that smokers in the sampling area consumed an average of 14.6 cigarettes per day for active smoker. Uncertainty and variability analysis by Monte Carlo simulation were used to refine this estimate: the procedure concluded that smokers in Dalian smoked between 10 and 27 cigarettes per day. This estimate showed good agreement with estimates from epidemiological research. Sewage-based epidemiology may be a useful additional tool for the large-scale monitoring of patterns of tobacco use. Probabilistic methods can be used to strengthen the reliability of estimated use generated from wastewater analysis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 17%
Other 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 12 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 5 14%
Engineering 4 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 15 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,047,742
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#11,555
of 25,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,645
of 311,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#249
of 419 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,588 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 419 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.