↓ Skip to main content

Rethinking Power Politics in an Interdependent World, 1871–1914

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Interdisciplinary History, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rethinking Power Politics in an Interdependent World, 1871–1914
Published in
Journal of Interdisciplinary History, March 2019
DOI 10.1162/jinh_a_01340
Authors

William Mulligan, Jack S. Levy

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 67%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2019.
All research outputs
#20,276,727
of 24,929,945 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Interdisciplinary History
#469
of 527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#276,465
of 360,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Interdisciplinary History
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,929,945 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.