↓ Skip to main content

The impact of the immune system on the safety and efficiency of enzyme replacement therapy in lysosomal storage disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
The impact of the immune system on the safety and efficiency of enzyme replacement therapy in lysosomal storage disorders
Published in
Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10545-016-9917-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Broomfield, S. A. Jones, S. M. Hughes, B. W. Bigger

Abstract

In the light of clinical experience in infantile onset Pompe patients, the immunological impact on the tolerability and long-term efficacy of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) for lysosomal storage disorders has come under renewed scrutiny. This article details the currently proposed immunological mechanisms involved in the development of anti-drug antibodies and the current therapies used in their treatment. Given the current understanding of the adaptive immune response, it focuses particularly on T cell dependent mechanisms and the paradigm of using lymphocytic negative selection as a predictor of antibody formation. This concept originally postulated in the 1970s, stipulated that the genotypically determined lack of production or production of a variant protein determines an individual's lymphocytic repertoire. This in turn is the key factor in determining the potential severity of an individual's immunological response to ERT. It also highlights the need for immunological assay standardization particularly those looking at describing the degree of functional impact, robust biochemical or clinical endpoints and detailed patient subgroup identification if the true evaluations of impact are to be realised.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Student > Master 5 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Other 7 27%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 23%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 12%
Neuroscience 3 12%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 4 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2021.
All research outputs
#15,359,595
of 22,849,304 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#1,474
of 1,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,327
of 297,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#12
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,849,304 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,844 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.