↓ Skip to main content

Implementation of the Rank-Weighted Co-localization (RWC) algorithm in multiple image analysis platforms for quantitative analysis of microscopy images

Overview of attention for article published in Source Code for Biology and Medicine, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 127)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Implementation of the Rank-Weighted Co-localization (RWC) algorithm in multiple image analysis platforms for quantitative analysis of microscopy images
Published in
Source Code for Biology and Medicine, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13029-016-0048-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vasanth R. Singan, Jeremy C. Simpson

Abstract

Quantitative co-localization studies strengthen the analysis of fluorescence microscopy-based assays and are essential for illustrating and understanding many cellular processes and interactions. In our earlier study, we presented a rank-based intensity weighting scheme for the quantification of co-localization between structures in fluorescence microscopy images. This method, which uses a combined pixel co-occurrence and intensity correlation approach, is superior to conventional algorithms and provides a more accurate quantification of co-localization. In this brief report we provide the source code and implementation of the rank-weighted co-localization (RWC) algorithm in three (two open source and one proprietary) image analysis platforms. The RWC algorithm has been implemented as a plugin for ImageJ, a module for CellProfiler and an Acapella script for Columbus image analysis software tools. We have provided with a web resource from which users can download plugins and modules implementing the RWC algorithm in various commonly used image analysis platforms. The implementations have been designed for easy incorporation into existing tools in a 'ready-for-use' format. The resources can be accessed through the following web link: http://simpsonlab.pbworks.com/w/page/48541482/Bioinformatic_Tools.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 24%
Researcher 5 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 20%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 28%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 3 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2016.
All research outputs
#7,603,340
of 23,321,213 outputs
Outputs from Source Code for Biology and Medicine
#43
of 127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,026
of 298,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Source Code for Biology and Medicine
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,321,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 127 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.