| Title |
Harmonisation of stem volume estimates in European National Forest Inventories
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Forest Science , February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13595-019-0800-8 |
| Authors |
Thomas Gschwantner, Iciar Alberdi, András Balázs, Sébastien Bauwens, Susann Bender, Dragan Borota, Michal Bosela, Olivier Bouriaud, Isabel Cañellas, Jānis Donis, Alexandra Freudenschuß, Jean-Christophe Hervé, David Hladnik, Jurģis Jansons, László Kolozs, Kari T. Korhonen, Milos Kucera, Gintaras Kulbokas, Andrius Kuliešis, Adrian Lanz, Philippe Lejeune, Torgny Lind, Gheorghe Marin, François Morneau, Dóra Nagy, Thomas Nord-Larsen, Leónia Nunes, Damjan Pantić, Joana A. Paulo, Tomas Pikula, John Redmond, Francisco C. Rego, Thomas Riedel, Laurent Saint-André, Vladimír Šebeň, Allan Sims, Mitja Skudnik, György Solti, Stein M. Tomter, Mark Twomey, Bertil Westerlund, Jürgen Zell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 4 | 36% |
| Unknown | 7 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 18% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 25 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 25% |
| Environmental Science | 18 | 24% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,795,131
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Forest Science
#28
of 1,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,634
of 371,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Forest Science
#2
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,018 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.