↓ Skip to main content

Schizophrenia-related abnormalities in the triple network: a meta-analysis of working memory studies

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Imaging and Behavior, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Schizophrenia-related abnormalities in the triple network: a meta-analysis of working memory studies
Published in
Brain Imaging and Behavior, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11682-019-00071-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dongya Wu, Tianzi Jiang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 18%
Other 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 12 24%
Psychology 9 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 12 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2019.
All research outputs
#15,563,046
of 23,132,033 outputs
Outputs from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#670
of 1,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,885
of 354,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#23
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,132,033 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.