↓ Skip to main content

New invasive patterns as a prognostic factor for superficial esophageal cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gastroenterology, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
New invasive patterns as a prognostic factor for superficial esophageal cancer
Published in
Journal of Gastroenterology, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00535-012-0587-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eisuke Ito, Soji Ozawa, Hiroshi Kijima, Akihito Kazuno, Takayuki Nishi, Osamu Chino, Hideo Shimada, Makiko Tanaka, Shigeaki Inoue, Sadaki Inokuchi, Hiroyasu Makuuchi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 31%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Psychology 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Unknown 6 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2016.
All research outputs
#15,359,595
of 22,849,304 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gastroenterology
#737
of 1,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,671
of 164,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gastroenterology
#12
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,849,304 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,089 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.