↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Practice Implications of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Clinical Practice Implications of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders
Published in
European Spine Journal, February 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00586-008-0637-6
Authors

Jaime Guzman, Scott Haldeman, Linda J. Carroll, Eugene J. Carragee, Eric L. Hurwitz, Paul Peloso, Margareta Nordin, J. David Cassidy, Lena W. Holm, Pierre Côté, Gabrielle van der Velde, Sheilah Hogg-Johnson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Lecturer 5 8%
Researcher 5 8%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 17 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 19%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 19 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2019.
All research outputs
#7,585,824
of 23,132,033 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#1,027
of 4,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,462
of 79,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#12
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,132,033 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,696 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.