↓ Skip to main content

Immunotherapeutic Potential of Anti-Human Endogenous Retrovirus-K Envelope Protein Antibodies in Targeting Breast Tumors

Overview of attention for article published in JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
30 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user
patent
7 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
129 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Immunotherapeutic Potential of Anti-Human Endogenous Retrovirus-K Envelope Protein Antibodies in Targeting Breast Tumors
Published in
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, January 2012
DOI 10.1093/jnci/djr540
Pubmed ID
Authors

Feng Wang-Johanning, Kiera Rycaj, Joshua B. Plummer, Ming Li, Bingnan Yin, Katherine Frerich, Jeremy G. Garza, Jianjun Shen, Kevin Lin, Peisha Yan, Sharon A. Glynn, Tiffany H. Dorsey, Kelly K. Hunt, Stefan Ambs, Gary L. Johanning

Abstract

The envelope (env) protein of the human endogenous retrovirus type K (HERV-K) family is commonly expressed on the surface of breast cancer cells. We assessed whether HERV-K env is a potential target for antibody-based immunotherapy of breast cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 141 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Student > Master 18 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 27 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 9%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 36 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 255. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#144,073
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#110
of 7,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#613
of 249,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#1
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,845 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.