You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Can the similarity index predict the causes of retractions in high-impact anesthesia journals? A bibliometric analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.4103/sja.sja_709_18 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mohamed R. El-Tahan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 17% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
| Professor | 2 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 11% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 17% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2019.
All research outputs
#6,739,829
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia
#57
of 448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,797
of 446,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia
#11
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 448 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.