You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Comparative Study of the Spatial Distribution of Schistosomiasis in Mali in 1984–1989 and 2004–2006
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, May 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000431 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Archie C. A. Clements, Elisa Bosqué-Oliva, Moussa Sacko, Aly Landouré, Robert Dembélé, Mamadou Traoré, Godefroy Coulibaly, Albis F. Gabrielli, Alan Fenwick, Simon Brooker |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Burkina Faso | 1 | 1% |
| Czechia | 1 | 1% |
| Mali | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 18% |
| Researcher | 16 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 16 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 18% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 22% |
| Unknown | 18 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2009.
All research outputs
#6,330,670
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#3,619
of 9,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,349
of 103,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#19
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.