You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Bifidobacterium dentium Bd1 Genome Sequence Reflects Its Genetic Adaptation to the Human Oral Cavity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Genetics, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000785 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marco Ventura, Francesca Turroni, Aldert Zomer, Elena Foroni, Vanessa Giubellini, Francesca Bottacini, Carlos Canchaya, Marcus J. Claesson, Fei He, Maria Mantzourani, Laura Mulas, Alberto Ferrarini, Beile Gao, Massimo Delledonne, Bernard Henrissat, Pedro Coutinho, Marco Oggioni, Radhey S. Gupta, Ziding Zhang, David Beighton, Gerald F. Fitzgerald, Paul W. O'Toole, Douwe van Sinderen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 173 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 42 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 17% |
| Unknown | 34 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 76 | 42% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 18 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 42 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2009.
All research outputs
#6,329,970
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Genetics
#4,129
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,929
of 172,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Genetics
#26
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.