| Title |
A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, January 1990
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02459570 |
| Authors |
Warren S. McCulloch, Walter Pitts |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 3% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 192 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 14% |
| Researcher | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 10% |
| Unknown | 51 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 41 | 21% |
| Computer Science | 30 | 15% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 9 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 52 | 26% |
| Unknown | 54 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2008.
All research outputs
#5,878,052
of 22,849,304 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#188
of 1,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,699
of 58,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,849,304 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,096 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.