↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Effect of Training Leading to Repetition Failure on Muscular Strength: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Erratum to: Effect of Training Leading to Repetition Failure on Muscular Strength: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Published in
Sports Medicine, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40279-016-0509-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tim Davies, Rhonda Orr, Mark Halaki, Daniel Hackett

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 25%
Student > Master 13 25%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 28 54%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 9 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,493,616
of 24,639,073 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#2,139
of 2,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,351
of 303,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#51
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,639,073 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,856 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 54.7. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.