| Title |
Resolving taxonomic uncertainty in vulnerable elasmobranchs: are the Madeira skate (Raja maderensis) and the thornback ray (Raja clavata) distinct species?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-015-0806-1 |
| Authors |
Rachel E. Ball, Barbara Serra-Pereira, Jim Ellis, Martin J. Genner, Samuel Iglésias, Andrew F. Johnson, Catherine S. Jones, Rob Leslie, Jennifer Lewis, Stefano Mariani, Gui Menezes, Francis Neat, Leslie R. Noble, David W. Sims, Andrew M. Griffiths |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 78 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 20% |
| Researcher | 15 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 15 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 48% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2016.
All research outputs
#16,037,367
of 24,397,600 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#881
of 1,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,494
of 409,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#13
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,397,600 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,509 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.