↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence and prognostic impact of kidney disease on heart failure patients

Overview of attention for article published in Open Heart, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence and prognostic impact of kidney disease on heart failure patients
Published in
Open Heart, January 2016
DOI 10.1136/openhrt-2015-000324
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ida Löfman, Karolina Szummer, Inger Hagerman, Ulf Dahlström, Lars H Lund, Tomas Jernberg

Abstract

The aim was to determine the prevalence of different degrees of kidney dysfunction and to examine their association with short-term and long-term outcomes in a large unselected contemporary heart failure population and some of its subgroups. We examined to what extent the different cardiac conditions and their severity contribute to the prognostic value of kidney dysfunction in heart failure. We studied 47 716 patients in the Swedish Heart Failure Registry. Patients were divided into five renal function strata based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation. The adjusted association between kidney function and outcome was examined by Cox regression. 51% of the patients had eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and 11% had eGFR <30. There was increasing mortality with decreasing kidney function regardless of age, presence of diabetes, New York Heart Association NYHA class, duration of heart failure and haemoglobin levels. The risk HR (95% CI) persisted after adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics, severity of heart disease, and medical treatment: eGFR 60-89: 0.86 (0.79 to 0.95); eGFR 30-59: 1.13 (1.03 to 1.24); eGFR 15-29: 1.85 (1.67 to 2.07); and eGFR <15: 2.96 ([2.53 to -3.47)], compared with eGFR ≥90. Kidney dysfunction is common and strongly associated with short-term and long-term outcomes in patients with heart failure. This strong association was evident in all age groups, regardless of NYHA class, duration of heart failure, haemoglobin level, and presence/absence of diabetes mellitus. After adjusting for differences in baseline data, aetiology and severity of heart disease and treatment, the strong association remained.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 11%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Other 19 24%
Unknown 21 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 48%
Engineering 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Mathematics 2 3%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 25 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,438,455
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Open Heart
#144
of 1,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,919
of 401,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open Heart
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,183 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.