↓ Skip to main content

Episcissors-60™ and obstetrics anal sphincter injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Episcissors-60™ and obstetrics anal sphincter injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00192-019-03901-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olga Divakova, Aethele Khunda, Paul A. Ballard

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 12%
Researcher 3 12%
Librarian 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 12 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 31%
Arts and Humanities 2 8%
Engineering 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 11 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2019.
All research outputs
#16,240,032
of 25,658,541 outputs
Outputs from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#1,756
of 2,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,946
of 368,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#21
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,916 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.