| Title |
Guidelines and recommendations for ensuring Good Epidemiological Practice (GEP): a guideline developed by the German Society for Epidemiology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Epidemiology, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10654-019-00500-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wolfgang Hoffmann, Ute Latza, Sebastian E. Baumeister, Martin Brünger, Nina Buttmann-Schweiger, Juliane Hardt, Verena Hoffmann, André Karch, Adrian Richter, Carsten Oliver Schmidt, Irene Schmidtmann, Enno Swart, Neeltje van den Berg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 12 | 60% |
| Philippines | 1 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 20% |
| Scientists | 3 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 113 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 27 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 21% |
| Unknown | 35 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,720,965
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Epidemiology
#259
of 1,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,711
of 367,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Epidemiology
#10
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.