You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Isotopically Modified Nanoparticles for Enhanced Detection in Bioaccumulation Studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Science & Technology, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1021/es2039757 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Superb K. Misra, Agnieszka Dybowska, Deborah Berhanu, Marie Noële Croteau, Samuel N. Luoma, Aldo R. Boccaccini, Eugenia Valsami-Jones |
| Abstract |
This work presents results on synthesis of isotopically enriched (99% (65)Cu) copper oxide nanoparticles and its application in ecotoxicological studies. (65)CuO nanoparticles were synthesized as spheres (7 nm) and rods (7 × 40 nm). Significant differences were observed between the reactivity and dissolution of spherical and rod shaped nanoparticles. The extreme sensitivity of the stable isotope tracing technique developed in this study allowed determining Cu uptake at exposure concentrations equivalent to background Cu concentrations in freshwater systems (0.2-30 μg/L). Without a tracer, detection of newly accumulated Cu was impossible, even at exposure concentrations surpassing some of the most contaminated water systems (>1 mg/L). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 29% |
| Researcher | 16 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 9% |
| Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 8 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 18 | 21% |
| Chemistry | 14 | 16% |
| Materials Science | 10 | 12% |
| Engineering | 8 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2012.
All research outputs
#16,048,318
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#15,949
of 20,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,800
of 248,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#116
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.