↓ Skip to main content

Long-term bio-cultural heritage: exploring the intermediate disturbance hypothesis in agro-ecological landscapes (Mallorca, c. 1850–2012)

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
Title
Long-term bio-cultural heritage: exploring the intermediate disturbance hypothesis in agro-ecological landscapes (Mallorca, c. 1850–2012)
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10531-015-0955-z
Authors

Joan Marull, Enric Tello, Nofre Fullana, Ivan Murray, Gabriel Jover, Carme Font, Francesc Coll, Elena Domene, Veronica Leoni, Trejsi Decolli

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 115 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Master 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 21 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 26%
Environmental Science 30 25%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 4%
Unspecified 4 3%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 29 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2019.
All research outputs
#13,508,774
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,646
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,093
of 266,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#18
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.