↓ Skip to main content

Feeding distinction: Economic and cultural capital in the making of food boundaries

Overview of attention for article published in Poetics, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Feeding distinction: Economic and cultural capital in the making of food boundaries
Published in
Poetics, April 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.poetic.2019.02.002
Authors

Filippo Oncini

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Student > Master 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Researcher 5 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 23 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 15 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Engineering 4 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 25 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2022.
All research outputs
#5,457,527
of 25,793,330 outputs
Outputs from Poetics
#170
of 546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,093
of 365,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Poetics
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,793,330 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 546 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.