↓ Skip to main content

A millennial long March–July precipitation reconstruction for southern-central England

Overview of attention for article published in Climate Dynamics, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
A millennial long March–July precipitation reconstruction for southern-central England
Published in
Climate Dynamics, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00382-012-1318-z
Authors

Rob Wilson, Dan Miles, Neil J. Loader, Tom Melvin, Laura Cunningham, Richard Cooper, Keith Briffa

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 73 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 21%
Student > Master 11 15%
Other 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 9 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 23 31%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 21 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 9%
Engineering 3 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 14 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#7,473,822
of 22,849,304 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#2,013
of 4,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,584
of 160,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#17
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,849,304 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,921 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.