↓ Skip to main content

Becoming Linked In: Leveraging Professional Networks for Elite Surveys and Interviews

Overview of attention for article published in Geographical Review, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Becoming Linked In: Leveraging Professional Networks for Elite Surveys and Interviews
Published in
Geographical Review, November 2019
DOI 10.1111/gere.12346
Authors

Ryan P. Dicce, Michael C. Ewers

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Unspecified 1 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 6 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 2 12%
Social Sciences 2 12%
Unspecified 1 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 7 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2019.
All research outputs
#16,200,001
of 23,883,950 outputs
Outputs from Geographical Review
#716
of 828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,241
of 363,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geographical Review
#250
of 321 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,883,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 321 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.