↓ Skip to main content

Are official psychiatric classification systems for mental disorders suitable for use in primary care?

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Are official psychiatric classification systems for mental disorders suitable for use in primary care?
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, February 2019
DOI 10.3399/bjgp19x701369
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sir David Goldberg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Professor 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Other 2 20%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 30%
Psychology 2 20%
Sports and Recreations 1 10%
Unspecified 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2020.
All research outputs
#6,627,247
of 23,835,032 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#2,234
of 4,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,630
of 355,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#72
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,835,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,421 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.