| Title |
Should we always use the peripheral cannula for distal leg reperfusion in femoro-femoral ECMO patients?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-019-05531-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Francesco Formica, Leonello Avalli, Fabio Sangalli, Pichoy Danial, Alain Combes, Guillaume Lebreton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 28% |
| Spain | 4 | 11% |
| Italy | 3 | 8% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Qatar | 1 | 3% |
| Vietnam | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| Turkey | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 61% |
| Scientists | 7 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 24% |
| Other | 3 | 18% |
| Researcher | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 53% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,527,167
of 24,066,486 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,299
of 5,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,130
of 356,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#36
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,066,486 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.